IDEOLOGY OF MORAL TOWN
The term moral it is customary to denote the set of those ethical, social and religious move to better the individual in their social group. When it comes to morality, well you never know what you are discussing, is an abstract conception that encompasses many concepts. - Yes, but what? -
First of all I would understand if it comes by itself or if it is imposed, it is a positive or negative, is determined by the consensus of views, whether relating to the historical context, or if it is driven by natural instinct flows. And then, I would learn to recognize the arts and emancipated, so that we can criticize or praise.
I think the reason for the better of this argument, we must improvise scientists, therefore arm ourselves with scalpels and dissect our patient. I would start to divide into two opposing sides morality that have nothing in common, but for a bizarre case, grow together and shape each other. The first, which we call moral and ethical social group, contains his thoughts on what is commonly called, right, wrong, good or bad, within a community. The second, which we call moral theological-religious group, includes all types of worship, belief and hope after death. Let us first.
To learn the social and ethical moral force, just walk around the town and stopping occasionally to exchange a few words with people from all kinds of age. At the end of the day, we collected enough clues to begin to understand and outline the elements that make up the morality of our time. Among these are the value of the sacrifices, so it all that hard work is considered right from the outset, the importance of work, so it has no value if a man without a job, respect for the law, not so much for civil , especially for fear of justice, suspicion and mistrust of any new action, because it is outside the "normal" town, the belief that something is good as long as it does not hurt anyone, just hurt those who think , that "live and let live", that is selfishness disguised (even if I start to think that these days is better than a healthy egoism that a weak love for others ..), good credit one man for what he says or preaches, and do not want regardless of what actually does, changing attitudes based on who he is facing, cases these changes especially the behavior of the parent to the child when he has to look good, the urge to run after every novelty in every field, as if being informed is synonymous with good taste or intelligence, think it right to your lifestyle, just because you do not have the ability to see beyond, and I end up here, but I could list others, with the progressive cultural degradation, carried out by modern man, who gives himself in his choices, but reacts its social context: where the man does not make society, but is the company that makes the man. If we imagine
morality as a path that you choose to go in terms of life, certainly is not good to ask for directions to our neighbors. Be careful not to follow, as percore, the flock of those who preceded us. There is nothing that hurts more when it comes to morality that conform to public opinion, and to give the right idea just because it receives more support than the others. I understand that people (the people) do not take place, are not active, but would rather rely on what he said those who came before. So doing, mistakes have been handed down from father to son, the company does not evolve and the younger generation is a photocopy of the previous ones.
For lack of will, or because the foundations rested and still based on limited or relativistic beliefs, like religion and not the ability to generate a deep thought, the moral ethics is not grown in step with technological change, and this generated in the so-called "civilized man", a strange way of seeing the social has become highly moral and all that we should no longer be respected. Everything will be ruined, but we care comfort. is paradoxical if we think what we care about our children and how they are damaging thinking of educating them.
Just staying away and distancing himself from the crowd we buy and enjoy the freedom of thought which unites minds healthy. The people, however, does not enjoy anything, because not having common sense, does not recognize the evil that afflicts him, defends him even with all his might.
The common morality in my view, is certainly negative, it consists of ideas for some dates that are simply false truth. Every age has its false morality, a set of errors, bad moods and subculture shared by the non-thinking. To the people, whether it's being imposed, or that it itself creates a false moral per se, does not interest, is the lack of propensity to think that this kind of common people, no ideas or different beliefs. The spirit of aggregation than the spirit of active personnel, hence the reason for dismissal. The moral and ethical social
common is a joke, a joke, a play with a bad grotesque scene, is for us to unmask, to make it ridiculous, to breathe again and enjoy the sun.
* * * * *
0 comments:
Post a Comment